I Call Judge Brooke Wells a 'Slut' a Lot!

While those despicable propaganda artists over on Groklaw stick to using legal arguments and common sense to present their side of the story, I forego such niceties, and prefer to utilize vicious brain dead vitriol! What better way to foster goodwill with the public and cast my SCO masters in a good light than by calling the judge presiding over our case a 'slut' repeatedly? We can't lose!

Here I am on Y!SCOX giving that uppity Judge what for!:

[[Sounds like a good way for SCOX to get SVR4 stuff into the trial.]]

Compulsory?
Maybe SCOX had to remember that IBM's interrogatory asked for *everything* in Linux that SCOX was claiming _any_ rights to.

Anyway, SCO copyright infringement in Linux was a marvellous Wookie for IBM to hide its own troubles with SCO behind the next few years and take advantage of BW's limited intellect not to mix separate issues.
Gee, did we play the poor little slut or not?
Linux contributions are public, Your Honor. OK, our code behind contributed methods to Linux is not. But that is hardly non-public Linux contribution information, is it?
Anyway, Randall is only gonna make that argument two years from now. Meanwhile it is very difficult for us to reasonably assess the proper scope of discovery in this case. But having IBM CC10 attached to it in a permissive, no, excuse me, ... in a compulsory way sure helps to keep it that way for us. Until Randall is ready. Deal?
http://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Business_%26_Finance/Investments/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_S/threadview?bn=2942&tid=410327&mid=410563

See what I mean? Not only did I call Judge Brooke Wells a "poor little slut", I also said she has a "limited intellect"!

We can't lose!